Quality Clouds for ServiceNow · For platform owners

Quality Clouds for ServiceNow · For platform owners

Know exactly what is running in every instance

Full Scan gives you the complete inventory: technical debt, security exposure, configuration risk, dormant code and adoption, across every scope. Then it shows you whether it is getting better or worse.

Full Scan gives you the complete inventory: technical debt, security exposure, configuration risk, dormant code and adoption, across every scope. Then it shows you whether it is getting better or worse.

The complete inventory

Everything Full Scan reports across every scope: debt, exposure, configuration risk, dormant code, adoption.

Health over time

Trend view. Debt created versus debt cleared per release, per team.

Release readiness

A defensible answer to whether you can go live, based on your gates rather than on how the last testing session felt.

Key person risk

When your most experienced developer leaves, the standard stays in the rule library and the history stays in the scan record.

Multi vendor governance

One standard applied to every team and every integrator working in your instance, with findings attributed.

Ask the estate

Insights Agent. Which scopes changed most this release? Where is the debt concentrated? Which team introduced the most high severity findings?

Independent engine

Our scanning runs outside the instance and does not consume your platform capacity.

Ask the estate a question. In your own words.

Insights Agent answers questions about your estate in plain language. No query builder, no report request, no waiting three days for somebody to pull the data. Ask it from your own LLM, from any MCP capable client, or from inside Now Assist.

What did we ship last month?

What did we ship last month?

417 configuration changes across 9 applications, from 23 developers. Six introduced high severity issues, and all six sit in Incident and Change.

Is anything going to block our next upgrade?

Is anything going to block our next upgrade?

Eleven customizations touch tables the upgrade replaces. Four of them have no owner recorded. Ranked by how much of the estate depends on each one.

Which team is creating the most rework?

Which team is creating the most rework?

Two teams account for most of the high severity findings this quarter. Both are working in scopes that were cloned rather than built, so the same pattern keeps repeating.

Sample answers shown. Every real answer is grounded in the scans you already run, and every number opens into the findings behind it.

The standard is yours, and so is the record.

Full Scan tells you what is in there. Governance is what stops it coming back. The inventory is the starting point, not the product.

Rule Builder

Your conventions written in plain English, then versioned like code. Naming, architecture, the pattern the team agreed and has quietly stopped following.

Rulesets per project

A project groups related ServiceNow instances under one context. The main instance carries the ruleset and the rest inherit it, and developer access is managed once for the group rather than environment by environment. It is how governance stays coherent as the estate grows.

Quality Gates

Set the bar once and it applies in the pull request and in the pipeline. You decide whether a failed gate blocks the promotion or simply reports.

Write-offs and peer review

Exceptions carry a reason and an approver and propagate across instances, so nobody argues the same finding twice.

Every finding carries a disposition. Every write-off carries a reason and an approver. Every rule change is recorded, with what changed and who approved it.

You now have agents changing your instances.

Now Assist and the agents your team builds in AI Agent Studio generate configuration continuously, and they do not wait for a review window. Anything that speaks MCP can call Quality Clouds mid-loop, so the agent is handed your rules before it writes rather than a rejection afterwards.

agent proposes → Quality Clouds returns the applicable rules and the violations → agent corrects → change lands

AI Virtual Agent Topics are scanned configuration in their own right, so the agents your team ships are governed the same way the code is. The question is no longer who wrote it, but whether the standard was enforced when it was written.

Get the complete inventory

Get the complete inventory