Know what your Salesforce estate is actually carrying
One standard, whatever your teams are building on.
Most estates are not one platform. Yours runs Salesforce, almost certainly ServiceNow as well, and a growing amount of code that no human wrote at all. Governing each of them separately produces three different definitions of good and no way to compare them.
Author the standard once. It is enforced the same way on ServiceNow, on Salesforce, and on the AI-generated code in your repositories.
Every instance, org and repository reports on the same scale, so you can compare them without a translation exercise first.
A rule waived for a good reason is waived on the record, with the reason and the approver attached, wherever it happened.
This is the question that does not get answered by buying a different tool for every platform.
The four questions you actually get asked.
Not by your platform team. By the board, by audit, and by whoever signs off the next release.
Quantified technical debt across every instance and org, with the issues behind the number, rather than a subjective health rating.
Which customizations sit in the path of the next platform release, what depends on them, and who owns them.
Debt created against debt cleared, release over release, so the trend is a number rather than a feeling.
One standard applied to every internal team and every system integrator delivering into your estate.
Each answer opens into the findings behind it, so the number survives being questioned.
Independent of the platform vendor.
Salesforce reports on Salesforce. Quality Clouds runs outside your orgs and reports on what the platform will not flag about itself: the SOQL that will hit a governor limit at scale, the permission set opened wider than anyone intended, the metadata nobody owns, and what Agentforce is generating while nobody is reviewing it.
Scanning runs outside the org against the metadata API, so it does not compete with your users for capacity.
Ask it yourself, in plain language.
You do not need a report builder or a ticket to the admin team to get an answer. Insights Agent takes the question the way you would say it out loud, from your own LLM, from any MCP capable client, or from inside Agentforce.
Volume across every org, who shipped it, and which changes introduced serious issues.
The fields, Flows and metadata nothing has touched in a year, ranked by what you would have to unpick.
Which orgs are drifting from the standard faster than they are being cleaned up.
Every finding carries a disposition. Every write-off carries a reason and an approver. Every rule change is recorded, with what changed and who approved it. Separately, and at company level rather than product level, Quality Clouds holds ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II. The scope of both is set out in the trust center.
Related articles
Stay ahead of the curve in Salesforce
Salesforce
DevOps & CI/CO
AI Code Governance
The Case for Native AI Code Governance in Modern Salesforce DevOps
Javier Luesma
5 min read
Discover why your governance must live inside your DevOps stack—not alongside it
Salesforce
AI Code Governance
Interview with Francis Pindar — AI Code Governance After Headless 360
Mariona Valero
6 min read
Salesforce MVP Francis Pindar explains how to build a governance framework that keeps pace with AI-generated code and configuration
AI Code Governance
Agentic AI
Salesforce
AI Finds Zero-Days Autonomously. Who Is Accountable When AI Ships One into Production?
Albert Franquesa
5 min read
ServiceNow Build Agent will quadruple usage in twelve months. The CISO’s question has shifted from detection to accountability